I am irritated right now...more so with myself for caring
, but also with the doctor's office's for their use of a "standard" growth chart instead a BF or FF based on the child's eating habits. Ya know?!
Samuel, at his 6 month appt today, was 17 lbs and 26.5 in long. This put him in the 37% for weight and 49% for height. REALLY?! 17 lbs is
smaller than 63% of other babies his age? I just find that hard to believe. Or either I'm just out of the loop for how big babies actually are around me...
So, my older ds was 20 lbs at his 6 month appt but he was totally different than Samuel. He nursed to sleep and he was less active. Sam eats, has loads of activity, and then sleeps a while later. He's going to weigh less-that's a given because he's burning more calories, but do you think most babies FTS, so
that's why the big difference?
I felt so good about 17 lbs before they told me where that "put" him....
Dr said he's growing fine, it just bugs me...can you tell?