Author Topic: Cooking Apples: tummy friend or foe?  (Read 1451 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kimberlina

  • Resident BW Chatterbox!
  • *****
  • Showing Appreciation 26
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1480
  • Location: British Texan
Cooking Apples: tummy friend or foe?
« on: October 28, 2010, 18:38:02 pm »
I have a RIDICULOUS amount of cooking apples, so thought that I would try to BLW/puree some for Jack today. Peeled, cored, sliced, steamed until HORRIBLY soft. BLW was NOT happening - he wasn't bothered - so I offered him some cooking apple puree from the tip of my fingers (I thought it tasted nice!) but he made a horrible face and spat it out...

...later on, he was squirming from his midsection and didn't want to lay down and began hiccuping. Seemed to me that the apples caused some reflux? Also, the following poo was quite green and watery...

Moral of the story: no more -

A) apples on their own (his parsnip/apple puree goes down a treat)
B) cooking apples
C) forcing him to accept puree off my finger when he clearly wasn't interested in the first place
D) all of the above...
E) __________________________________________

HELP! Any recipes for yummy cooking apples, or not until he's 7mo and can have a baby-crumble?
♥ Kim
   

Offline Mashi

  • Resident BW Chatterbox!
  • *****
  • Showing Appreciation 408
  • Posts: 16805
  • Location:
Re: Cooking Apples: tummy friend or foe?
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2010, 18:53:23 pm »
We had issues with apples the first 3-4 times DS had them. He was seeing a hospital paed for his milk allergy and when I mentioned it he said it was totally normal with apples, it just takes them a while to get used to the pectin in them.  I stopped with them, but about 8-9 months started again ... so you can make and freeze and see if you can add them into his diet later?

As for other recipes, I do baked apples in my slow cooker...core them as best as you can, and put some of brown sugar, some raisins and a few drops of golden syrup in each core.  Put them in slow cooker sitting upright, add about 1-2 cms of water and a drop or two of vanilla in the crock and cook on low ... hard to say how long as I find it depends on the number of apples and how soft you want them, maybe 3-4 hours?  If you don't have a slow cooker you can do them in a glass baking tray but I cut them in half and core them in this case. Sprinkle with sugar, riasins cinnamon and a touch of vanilla in the water and bake until soft.  I either eat them when they are still a wee bit warm with a spoon (omg soooooooooo good) or scoop out the puree and mix it into plain or greek yogurt! yum yum!

Offline *Julie*

  • Resident BW Chatterbox!
  • *****
  • Showing Appreciation 34
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1773
  • We are in England,Suffolk
  • Location: Suffolk,UK
Re: Cooking Apples: tummy friend or foe?
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2010, 22:49:31 pm »
 You can cook them on their own and freeze them for later.
 Combine them with stuff  -  like you are doing with parsnips - they will go well with pork, chicken, and for mixing with really sweet fruits - pears, bananas etc
  I have a few recipes (babyfood and for grown-ups) but Mashi`s is gooood...



Offline Kimberlina

  • Resident BW Chatterbox!
  • *****
  • Showing Appreciation 26
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1480
  • Location: British Texan
Re: Cooking Apples: tummy friend or foe?
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2010, 18:36:37 pm »
Some great ideas, Mashi, thank you!! The recipe sounds delicious!! Is that also ok for Jack to eat with the sugar in? I have no idea what additives he could/should have!

I feel so ill prepared!  :-\

That's probably a great idea with the pork! I think I'll make some puree to freeze and then I can mix it later with meats!!

Thanks ladies!! :D
♥ Kim
   

Offline Mashi

  • Resident BW Chatterbox!
  • *****
  • Showing Appreciation 408
  • Posts: 16805
  • Location:
Re: Cooking Apples: tummy friend or foe?
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2010, 18:57:19 pm »
No, I wouldn't give it to him with the sugar, though I know a lot of people would.  I still don't let my DS have them when I bake them that way with the sugar and he's 2! LOL! When I do them that way they are for me!  For DS I do them the same way but totally sugar free. As a baby I baked all of his fruit - just cut in half, remove stones/seeds, etc and pop in the oven in a dish with a bit of water.  Pears, peaches, plums, apples - all sooooo yummy baked in the oven.  When they are soft enough they are done - remove from water with a slotted spoon and let them cool on a plate. When cool the skins will slip off (even plums!).

Offline deb

  • Resident BW Chatterbox!
  • *****
  • Showing Appreciation 593
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 21312
  • Resident Nac Mac Feegle
  • Location:
    • My Very Own Crunchy & Progressive Parenting Blog
Re: Cooking Apples: tummy friend or foe?
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2010, 19:22:43 pm »
Apples are also pretty high in fructose, which can be hard for baby tummies to handle early on. Both my kids can only handle small amounts of it even now; well-meaning people who give them juice boxes usually means me ending up with 2 girls with tummy-aches later on, and bum rashes as well. Granny Smith apples have less sugar in them and might be easier to handle if you get to the point where you're ready to try again. Just go easy, small portions - you've gotten some great advice.

When we do apples, we most often make applesauce with them. Core, peel (if I'm not too lazy LOL), chunk, cook with a BIT of extra liquid (water is fine), no need for any added sugar unless you're using Granny Smiths (the tart green ones) and not necessarily even then. Either use an immersion blender to whiz the cooked apple pieces or pour the whole shebang into a blender that can handle boiling temps and whiz till it's the consistency you like it. Add cinnamon if you must, but it's delicious just like that, the apples cooked alone. :) And as PP have mentioned, that's easy enough to freeze, maybe later on mix with meat or veg or yogurt or eat on its own when he's ready, or use in cake recipes as a substitute for oil.