Hi! It's my first time here and I have a question related to the same issue: 7-month old LO who started with pureed solids exactly 5 weeks ago. I don't know whether I should start another topic, but this one was so similar to mine that I decided to ask it here, hope it's ok
Tracy says that we should always give solid food first, then milk feed. Here in the forum, however, it seems to be common sense that the feed milk comes first (in this case in a 4-hour routine) and then we should offer (pureed) solids 1 hour later. I live and Germany and I don't know whether it's cultural or whether there is a reason for it, but here food comes first in the meal we're trying to substitute and milk is only given after these meals if the LO is still hungry. In this case, adapting the German customs to a 4-hour routine, I would BF at 7 a.m., no other meal until 11 a.m., when pureed food is served as lunch (with the intention of substituting this meal, so that milk is only given in case the child seems to be hungry after eating). At 3 p.m. I would BF again and at around 6 p.m. milk and cereals would be the dinner. At around 7:30 p.m. I would BF her again right before going to bed (she does not fall asleep on the breast though
). She still wakes for DF.
I have a lot of questions
Please help me
1) I personally find BF at 7 a.m., 11 a.m., 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. more practical for routine's sake, in which case I would offer pureed food at noon (after BF) and at 6 p.m. (before BF). Is there any difference for LO if I BF her at 11 a.m. before her "lunch" at noon? I mean in terms of amount of food, learning to substitute milk for solids, etc.?
2) If I BF at 11 a.m. and give food at noon, the real A time is too short, actually only between 11:15-noon and 12:45-1:15 p.m., depending on how long it takes her to eat lunch. Isn’t it too short?
3) In case I go for Tracy's suggestion and give (pureed) solids before BF, how can I structure the BF routine? I would not like to produce less from one moment to the other, and stretching the intervals could lead to it, couldn't it? For example if I BF at 7 a.m. and give her food at 11 a.m., then BF again as a snack at around 12/ 1 p.m., then BF again at 3 p.m. (Germans would probably start giving fruit and cereals for this meal by now), milk and cereal for dinner at 6 p.m. and BF at 7 p.m., would this be too unstructured? What about leaving out the snack BF at 12/1 p.m. and only BF again with a 4-hour interval from the last meal (food at lunch), at 3 p.m.? The problem I see here is that if I go for this plan, soon I would be offering a meal instead of the BF at 15:00 and I would end up BF her only at 7 a.m. and at 7 p.m. Another problem is that I'm not sure whether it's correct to continue with the goodnight feed at 7 p.m., because when she is too tired she ends up sleeping on the breast.
4) I don't wish to wean LO yet, but I wouldn't like to BF her forever. By increasing the amount of food she eats as well as offering food at more times of the day during other times in which she would normally BF (for example when she is 9 months), would it work more or less as a baby-led weaning?
I know it’s a lot to ask, I hope you can help me